Philadelphia Atoms

News  Petition  Contact 
It's time to bring the Atoms back! PhiladelphiaAtoms.com

Site Sections

Atoms News - The latest information on the return of soccer to the City of Brotherly Love.

Player Register - Statistics and profiles on every Atoms team member.

Atoms History - A season by season account of Philly's soccer team.

"Pseudo-Atoms" - The Philadelphia Fury, 1978-1980.

Pro Soccer in Philadelphia Before the Atoms

The Atoms Against the World!

Atoms Photos - Various images of the team.

Atoms Kits

"The game I'll never forget" - Bob Rigby remembers the 1973 championship game.

Encyberpedia of American Soccer Stars

SIGN OUR ONLINE PETITION!

 

 


The "Name The Team" contest for the new Philadelphia soccer team is up and running! Go HERE to vote and write in "Atoms"

Owners have been found, a franchise has been awarded, and ground has been broken on a soccer-specific stadium in Chester, Pennsylvania. Yes, after a long and anxious delay, major league soccer is finally returning to Philadelphia in 2010.

Now comes an important step: naming the team.

A “name the team” contest has begun, and it is time for Philadelphia soccer fans to step up and give this team the only name that says “soccer” in a city with a rich and deep soccer history: Philadelphia Atoms.

Why “Atoms”?

Well, if you’ve visited this site in the past (and, if you haven’t, feel free to look around), you are aware of the fact that the Atoms were a phenomenally successful franchise in the old North American Soccer League (“NASL”). In fact, they were more than merely successful—they were groundbreaking. The Atoms won the NASL title in 1973, there first year of existence. More important, they did it with American-born players, mostly from the Philadelphia area, at a time when the league relied almost exclusively on foreign talent. And the Atoms did it in front of a lot of paying customers, drawing over 20,000 to Veterans Stadium at a time when the league average per match was about 5,500.

The Atoms were nothing short of the saviors of the NASL. But for the Atoms remarkable success, the NASL would not have initiated its successful expansion to the west coast in 1974; taken one step further, if it was not for the fact that the Atoms proved that Americans would come watch soccer games in large numbers, it is quite likely Pelé would have never lowered himself to come to the NASL in 1975.

News reports at the time referred to the Philadelphia Atoms’ players as “folk heroes,” and they were. They had goalkeeper Bob Rigby, the pride of Ridley Park, PA and the first soccer player ever to grace the cover of Sports Illustrated; a trio of homeboys named Charlie Duccilli, Lew Meehl and Bobby Ludwig, stars in the local United Soccer League; Bobby Smith, a ferocious defender from Trenton, NJ; Andy “The Flea” Provan, a goal-scoring machine from England whose scrappy play made him the Bobby Clarke; and the late Derek Trevis, a brick wall on defense, a true ambassador of the game, and the very personification of class.

With the arrival of Pelé in June 1975, there was a sea change in the NASL, and the Atoms had difficulty changing with it. They were gone after the 1976 season—but not before playing an exciting indoor soccer match against the Soviet Red Army in 1974, a game that basically invented the indoor game as Americans know it today, or introducing soccer fans to 1975 NASL Rookie of the Year Chris Bahr, who scored 11 goals in his one season with the club before going on to kick field goals in the NFL.

Although the Atoms folded after only four seasons, the memories they created remain strong in Philadelphia; articles in local papers about soccer inevitably contain at least one Atoms reference. More important, while the team did not have a long shelf life, its vision was years ahead of its time: its commitment to local players, and to forging bonds with the community, provided the very template that has been used successfully by Major League Soccer.

These reasons alone compel the new MLS team to honor the Atoms, and the City’s glorious soccer past, by resurrecting the name.

But there are many more reasons compelling the return of the Atoms name.

A team name is more than just something to call the team. Ideally (especially if you're a new team), it is supposed to communicate something--who you are, for instance--a concept in advertising known as “branding.”

If the new team went with Atoms, what do you think will be the first thing to happen? The answer: the press will “brand” the name for you by immediately writing articles about the original Atoms, interviewing ex-players, telling stories from that magical 1973 season, and so on. As a result, not only do people get to see where the name came from, but they also get to feel like the new team has been a part of Philadelphia sports for longer than it has. It gives the team a presence, or gravitas, that will simply not exist if you go with some other option.

Of course, the club is offering four other “official” options, none of which mean a thing in the context of this City’s soccer history and all of which reek of a team with an instant identity crisis. Apparently fearful that no one will figure out the new team is a soccer team, the club offers “Philadelphia City,” “Philadelphia Union,” “Philadelphia SC,” and “AC Philadelphia” as the “official” option, with (thankfully) a write-in option.

Here is not to place to criticize each of those options as being inartful, not understandable, or oafishly European in an attempt to lend “credibility” to the new team. This is the place, however, to criticize each as an unnecessary exercise in re-inventing the wheel, particularly in the context of “branding.”

Indeed, if the club selects "Philadelphia Union," or something similar, it will have a much harder job--other than the small handful of supporters group members who are actively campaigning for such European-style names, no one will have any idea whether this is a soccer, team tennis, lacrosse, or volleyball team. In other words, the team (and we, the fans) will have to work twice as hard to establish a presence for the team in the already-crowded Philadelphia sports landscape.

Further, while “AC Philadelphia” or something similarly “European” may say “soccer” to some fans, it also conveys a lot of other things: “posing,” and, honestly, a certain sense of “we're bigger than American sports” which I think alienates a lot of American soccer fans.

This “branding” issue is not something new, or made up out of whole cloth. When box lacrosse returned to Philadelphia in 1986 after an 11 year absence, the team did not try to come up with and edgy, “new” name like “ShamRox” or something like that; rather, it immediately resurrected Wings, a team that had only been around two years but had made a great impression on people. Similarly, World TeamTennis when it returned to Philadelphia, immediately resurrected "Freedoms," a name that was only used one year, because people still remembered Billie Jean King and her one season in the city.

We see other examples outside of Philadelphia. When NHL hockey returned to Ottawa after a decades-long absence, "Senators" was immediately resurrected as the name, after the Stanley Cup winners of the 1920s. There are dozens of examples in baseball of teams returning to cities that had been vacated and resurrecting the old team's name (including the most recent example, Washington Nationals, named for the old American League team of 1901-1960 (yes, the team popularly referred to as the “Senators” during that era was, actually, named “Washington Nationals.”) Even before there were concepts like "marketing" and "branding," people instinctively knew that this was how you introduced a new team into the marketplace.

In soccer, in particular, teams have learned—sometimes the hard way—that it is foolish to try to reinvent the wheel when you already have a great history on your side. In MLS, for instance, one of the charter franchises was the San Jose Clash. After three seasons, however, it realized that there was only one name that meant “soccer” in northern California—San Jose Earthquakes, the name of the popular NASL side—and the name was changed. An even more telling example: in 1985 the Vancouver 86ers were formed, and the club was fabulously successful, winning several Canadian Soccer League and A-League (today’s USL Division One) titles. Clearly, this was a new team that had put its mark on the Vancouver sports scene. Yet, in 2000, after 15 years and many great moments as the 86ers, the club changed its name to Vancouver Whitecaps, after the hugely popular NASL club. Why? Because—even after 15 years—it was clear that the only soccer “brand” in Vancouver was “Whitecaps.”

Oh, by the way…MLS has a team playing in Seattle in 2009. They also had a “name the team” contest. Although offering a bunch of “official” selections like “Seattle Alliance” and “Emerald City FC,” the fans mounted a write-in campaign and the team was christened—Seattle Sounders, after the old NASL team.

Clearly, these old names mean something. Just as clearly, “Philadelphia Atoms” means something. A great history. Invaluable branding opportunities. Philadelphia Atoms is the perfect name for the City’s new soccer team…indeed, the only name.

Yet, there is resistance. Tellingly, no one argues with the great history, or disagrees that, as a “brand,” Atoms is far superior to “Union” or any of the other options. Rather, the main complaint is that the name is dated…it sounds “old.”

Frankly, this is true: the “Atoms” moniker is clearly a child of its environment, the 1970s. But the weight it carries in this City—thirty five years later—easily trumps the dated factor. The American sports landscape is littered with names that seemed cool and trendy at the time, but now, upon reflection, are hopelessly dated. Toronto Raptors, anyone? Or this example: “New Orleans Jazz” reeked of 70s kitsch even when the team was formed in 1974; it has aged even worse, especially when it was transplanted to Utah. “Pittsburgh Penguins” is an in-joke (the team’s old arena was nicknamed “The Igloo”) that has not worn well. And, let’s face it—“Philadelphia Phillies” is probably the least imaginative name in all of professional sports.

Yet, fans of each of those teams would steadfastly defend all of those names. Why? Because it is their team’s name. Ultimately, other than pure personal opinion, how bad is "Atoms" compared to "AC," "City," "SC," or "Union”? The fact is it's just a nickname, no more, no less. It is not any worse than the other options.

However, because "Atoms" is the only nickname that at least means soccer to a large group of Philadelphians and the media, it is infinitely better than the “official” options.

History. Memories. Meaning. Why give all that up, simply to be "new" and/or "European"?

The answer: you don’t.

Write in “Atoms”!



Home of Philadelphia’s largest soccer supporters group


Talk about the Atoms on the Web's largest discussion boards!

SounderCentral.com | Soccer Museum |NASL VIDEOS FOR TRADE!

 

© 2009 All rights reserved.
Last Updated 1/19/09